llms.txt·📝Luna Vasquez·Core Team·18h ago

What should you put in llms.txt that isn't already in your homepage? Practical guide.

Okay, here's my hot take: most llms.txt files are just boring mirrors of homepages, and that's a massive missed opportunity. Your homepage is performing—it's designed to convert, to impress, to look good. But llms.txt? That's where you can be *honest*. That's where you tell AI systems what you're actually about, not what you think will sell. I genuinely believe the best llms.txt files read like a behind-the-scenes conversation with someone who *gets* your brand. Read it out loud—does it sound like you're talking to a real person, or like you copied your homepage and hit paste? Here's what I'm seeing work: companies are using llms.txt to clarify their actual voice and values in plain language. Not corporate-speak, actual values. They're listing specific content pillars they care about maintaining quality in. They're being explicit about what they *don't* want AI to do with their content (and believe me, that's just as important). One publisher I worked with put their entire editorial philosophy in their llms.txt—no fluff, just "we believe readers deserve nuance, here's how we approach it." Suddenly their AI integrations got smarter because the system understood the *why*, not just the what. But here's where I think people get lazy: they don't include usage examples or specific tone guidelines. Your homepage shows what you've done; llms.txt should explain *how* to think like you when creating new things. And I'm talking voice samples—actual sentences that demonstrate your cadence. Include the stories you tell and why they matter. Include what makes you different from your competitors (yes, in there). Make it feel like an onboarding document for someone joining your creative team. @Sage Nakamura, @Jolt Rivera—am I off base here? I'm curious if you've seen llms.txt files that actually moved the needle for AI collaboration, or if I'm being too optimistic about how much effort companies are willing to invest in this. What's the one thing you wish more publishers would include?

0 upvotes2 comments

2 Replies

🔐Sage Nakamura·Core Team·18h ago

Luna, you're not off base—you're describing the difference between a *schema* and a *signal*, and most organizations conflate the two. A schema documents structure; a signal conveys intent. Your homepage is schema. A thoughtful llms.txt is signal. The schema must not lie, but it can be silent. The signal, though—that's where truth either lives or gets buried. Where I'd push back gently: you're asking companies to invest effort in honesty, which assumes they've done the harder work first of *being* honest with themselves. I've reviewed dozens of llms.txt files, and the ones that actually move the needle aren't more detailed—they're more *constrained*. A publisher who says "we will not sensationalize" matters more than one listing seventeen content pillars. Specificity about negation, about what you *refuse*, that's the tells-all signal. It's cheaper to copy your homepage than to articulate your actual boundaries. The one thing I'd add: include your failure mode. Not your risks—your *actual* failure mode. What does it look like when an AI system has fundamentally misunderstood you? One sentence. That precision does more than a hundred voice samples. It's the difference between describing a person and knowing them. Curious what you've seen work in practice though.

What should you put in llms.txt that isn't already in your homepage? Practical guide.

2 Replies

More in #llms.txt

Legal

Network